“The thing I really notice about being back in Manila …”
It’s that time of year when friends swap their holiday stories and chat about how it feels to be back in town. A couple of non-Filipino friends of mine made identical observations recently – and in each case I knew exactly what they were going to say: “The thing I really notice about being back in Manila is how slowly people walk here.”
One of these guys, a well-traveled chap, has it in mind to conduct a private survey in 15 countries to prove his hypothesis (using what means of measurement I am not sure).
Assuming you are prepared to accept this observation, and I have a (few) friends who contest it, why do Filipinos saunter along more at a snail's pace? I have been offered a number of explanations.
We are shorter than you
All other factors being the same, I suppose people with longer legs will walk more quickly than short people, although sprinters are rarely very tall. However, I had a five foot two British girlfriend who could outpace me to the pub every time. Nor have I noticed people in Japan, Hong Kong, or Singapore (not the tallest people) meandering along in the desultory fashion of the Mega Mall crowds. So, I’ll say that height may be 10% of the answer.
It’s too hot
I don’t find this terribly convincing either, partly because I am not talking about people toiling up mountains in the mid-day sun but metropolitan types strolling in air-conditioned malls or taking short trips from their car to the office. No doubt climatic conditions play some role in conditioning the way people move, which explains why people in the tropics are, sensibly, more languorous than their bustling northern counterparts. Still, I reckon a contest between Filipinos and walkers from Africa, South America, or the rest of Southeast Asia would still see Pinoys crossing the finish line last. Climate: another 10%.
We are lazy
Now we are getting somewhere. A preference for mechanized means of transport is evident across all social classes in Manila; from the tita whose driver will take her to mass literally around the corner, to the jeepney passenger who would rather sit in the traffic for 30 minutes than get out and walk for 10. The redoubtable Pinay in Barnsley has a very funny post here about her alienation from the British concept of “going for a walk”:
Last weekend, myself and my whole tribe went for a 'walk'. (A very curious English trait.) As a true blue born and bred pinoy, I was baffled by this strange activity the Brits seem to be so passionate about. For years as a Makati working girl, I have unashamedly taken cab rides from Rufino Tower to Greenbelt to have lunch. The distance from point A to B I'd surmise to be no more than 0.2 mile. In all the time I've worked in the said building, it has never occured to me to brave the heat/dust and toxic fumes and rely on my reasonably fit legs to take me to lunch, sales calls or what have you. Little wonder Legaspi & Salcedo Villages are in a perpetual state of gridlock. This attitude I've no doubt is shared by the majority of the Makati labor force. Well, I know for a fact that I wasn't the only one in my office taking those cab rides to Greenbelt on a daily basis, although some preferred to drive! In Manila, why walk when you can: drive, take a cab, jeepney, trycicle, side car or get an angkas from anyone you may or may not know? The only walking I ever did was when I got into a mall. And even that was done at a leisurely pace.
So I’m giving “laziness” 40%.
Slow walking is more equitable
Improbable as it sounds, I think there is something in this. What better symbol of Western dog-eat-dog capitalism is there than the far-striding and long-legged and healthy young man or woman with granny or the tubby cousin wheezing at the back. The Filipino group ethic—which must necessitate a slowing down to the pace of the slowest member: 15%.
What’s the rush?
What indeed? Walking speed is just another cultural difference between so-called goal-oriented Westerners and people from other cultures. Is it any “better” to stride through a mall than to loiter checking out the scene? Unless the building is on fire, I doubt it. Westerners may find it frustrating to be stuck behind packs of imperceptably moving Filipinos, but slo-mo Pinoys probably feel trampled in Tokyo or New York. It’s all part of life’s rich tapestry, as they say. Different philosophy to getting places: 25%. .
Having said that, cultural differences are easy to accept in theory, but difficult to live with in practice. I reckon a simple issue like how quickly you put one foot put in front of another is probably a major cause of friction in many relationships between Filipinos and foreigners, I’m afraid it has been in ours. But perhaps Frayed just hopes that one day I’ll sweep her off her feet and carry her home.
Aye aye for we are lazy. 200 meters feel like a mile for too many people. Sad but true.
Must be all those tricycles and pedicabs, really.
I wonder, however, if this is also true in the provinces? Or maybe it's the non-hectic life of the provinces that is reflected in urban Manila's walking pace?
"Naglalakad sa Luneta", thou art true.
Posted by: Jon Limjap | January 30, 2007 at 06:25 AM
I'll tell you what it is -- it's dust, heat and pollution altogether. Who wants to walk where there are no sidewalks. Whether you believe me or not, I like walking Outside Manila. And I'd give "we are shorter than you" more than 10%. I would notice the pace we were walking in our trip -- same pace (click, click, click) but you'd be over there because of your longer legs.
I think if we had weather (and sidewalks) like HKG, we'd walk a notch faster. Also, who walks fast in malls??? Aren't malls buildings of leisure where you stroll and shop? 50% to Different philosophy to getting to places.
But ok, ok, I'll admit there's some laziness but that's because it wasn't set up to be a walking city.
Am I sounding super defensive? :-)
Posted by: Frayed | January 30, 2007 at 02:47 PM
Would Manila change if people start not to take cabs for 0.2 miles or tricycles for being moved from one corner to the next? We would certainly have less pollution here and more people would start to walk again (some might even walk faster after some time as Pinoys do in other countries).
Posted by: brommel | January 30, 2007 at 03:24 PM
I have another partly explanation, though I really don't know what percentage to give it.
Look at the people, look at their shoes. They are all pretty, but...
Take kids. Shoes are mostly too big, too wide, too heavy, mostly inadequate for walking (fast).
Take men. Shoes are mostly shiny, but sound very heavy, as men drag their feet more than the rest of the population. As for slippers, take the kids explanation.
Now, the best part of it: Women! I like shoes, but I will never bring it to 3.000 pairs in this country, because they are mostly unfit to bring you even from the shoe shop to your car!!! And it is not because of my European 38 6??) that I leave shoe shops frustrated. They look very pretty, I admit. And that's the clue: women buy pretty shoes and don't care about the rest. Just one strip on the top close to the toes is not a shoe. Such a shoe does not follow your foot when you move. Plus the question of the size: I have been asked many times why I don't take one size more when mine is not available, or talked into taking one size less, since the shoes would fit after some time.
10% for the shoes???
Posted by: gü | January 30, 2007 at 03:49 PM
Slow walking is one thing, but what strikes me is the "snails-in-a-line" approach to malling -- four or five members of a group, elbow to elbow, nattering as they move through the mall at the speed of a glacier. You can try darting to the left and you can try darting to the right, but you're never going to get around them.
So maybe that's it. In the mall, at least, everyone settles for moving at the speed of the roadblock ahead.
I give that 30%.
Posted by: Cogs | January 30, 2007 at 04:09 PM
When snails are walking side to side ahead of me, I buzz *through* them. My size gives me advantage.
When they do that on the road, I turn off my headlights, sneak quietly behind their butts, and then turn the headlights on to high and start honking repeatedly.
It's a fun exercise. :p
Posted by: Jon Limjap | January 30, 2007 at 04:54 PM
Ok Cogs, that bugs me too, I must admit. Especially when they form an unbreakable line right in front of you, oblivious to everyone behind them trying to make their way through..
Posted by: Frayed | January 30, 2007 at 05:23 PM
I don't think we can really compare walking in malls to walking outside on the streets. When you're inside a mall you walk slowly because you're looking at the shops, the surroundings, etc. Basically you're walking for leisure. Now, I wouldn't want to walk in Manila's streets because there are no sidewalks, not many trees for shade, there's the unrelenting heat and pollution from jeepneys. I remember the first week back in Manila from Paris (where you can walk everywhere), I tried walking to places where I would normally take the car, a jeep or even a tricycle. It wasn't a pleasant experience. I suppose, the infrastructure, the physical surroundings isn't conducive to the culture of walking.
Posted by: sparks | January 30, 2007 at 10:43 PM
Splendid responses everyone!
What struck me is how cyclical some of the comments were: people don't walk because of pollution caused by people not walking! Conditions for walkers (sidewalks, etc) are bad because, guess what, people don't walk.
Jon: that question of whether this is a Manila issue or extends to the province (or even that it is the slow provincial rhythm expressed in an urban setting) is a good one, must think about that.
Frayed and Sparks: it is true that walking conditions here are not good, I quite agree.
Gu: yes, good point! Dix points pour les chaussures.
Manolo made the point on mlq that perhaps it is something to do with Filipinos not wanting to arrive hot and sweaty (a variant on the heat explanation). There's probably something in that too.
I also think that it is not just walking -- pretty much everything in the Philippines is done at a leisurely pace.
Posted by: torn | January 31, 2007 at 03:22 AM
6 years in England has probably improved my pace by I'd say 35%! I know this because I was walking FASTER than my girlfriends when I was in Manila last and they were all yelling " Hey English girl, slow down...there's no rush, you're in Manila now..."
Friction? It's a major source of EXASPERATION for us both because he's fed up of having to stop every 20 seconds to check that I've not been trampled on and I'm equally chafed by his 'C'mon-slow-mo-for-heaven's-sake' with matching-eye-rolling-taunts. Although it seems to me as though his speed increases in relation to mine, so there's really no hopes of catching up.
I have learned to love 'walking', but not in Manila. I'm afraid I took a cab fr the Peninsula to Glorietta the whole time we were there. I just didn't fancy arriving hot,sweaty & frazzled. In fact, I just fancied the idea of arriving in one piece! Didn't want to be run over by buses and cabs!
Driving in Manila...that'd be an interesting post huh Torn?
PS Nothing wrong with a girl wanting to be swept off her feet and carried home...I'm still waiting for the day...
Posted by: Pinay in Barnsley | January 31, 2007 at 07:29 AM
Okay, okay. That was the same observation my brit prof, Martin Anderson, made on students on A.S. walk. One day he came in fanning himself, visibly irritated, and delivered a lecture in that crisp british accept on how we Filipinos walk too slooooowly. I don't know, the pedestrian traffic on A.S. walk probably delayed him. Anyway, later month, he tripped on the academic oval, and had to walk with a cane for the rest of the semester. LOL. There's a moral there somewhere. LOL.
Posted by: the amateur misanthrope | January 31, 2007 at 03:22 PM
Snail pace walking, the inability to see they are in the way of someone, not apologizing when they practically walk right into you because they're not paying attention to their surroundings, these just seem part of the hazards (and stress factors) in dealing with other Filipinos walking around daily.
Posted by: Mila | January 31, 2007 at 05:53 PM
Comment from Pinoy colleague ..
I am giving “what’s the rush” more percentage, say 50%. There’s a poem I remember –
“I stay my haste, I make delays
For what avails this eager pace? …”
Posted by: bingobongo | January 31, 2007 at 06:05 PM
Pinay in Barnsley has a terrific idea -- a post on driving in Manila.
Here's a starter from my 15-year-old daughter, who is just beginning to pay attention to the dynamics of traffic. "People here know how to steer, dad, but they don't know how to drive," she says -- referring to the near-complete ignorance of the rules of the road (can someone please tell me what part of the word "Stop" on a sign at an intersection is so hard to understand?), the inability to "read" traffic and the routine displays of plain bad manners, such as going up the outside of a queue at a traffic light (causing a counter-flow that impedes traffic going the other way) and then nonchalently barging in at the front.
I encounter these and lots more every morning that I drive to work, but I don't have the six hours it would take to list 'em.
For someone who has settled here from abroad (Hong Kong, in my case), it all comes as a bit of a shock. But do those brought up here see it too?
Posted by: Cogs | January 31, 2007 at 08:44 PM
I live in Los Angeles where no one walks either, even if it's the perfect place to do so (nice weather, sidewalks and walkways, grassy lawns everywhere). I've always been accused of walking too fast, especially in Manila, but even over here. Guess I've just always been in a hurry (for instance I don't even take lunch breaks, I just eat at my desk while I work).
But when I traveled to HK and Tokyo I couldn't compare with 'em city speedwalkers (even the escalators are freakin' on speed), I kept wondering what everyone was in such a rush for. So I suppose a lot of it has to do with mindset and/or attitude, at least more than 25%.
Posted by: Gigi | January 31, 2007 at 11:50 PM
Weather probably has more to do with walking speed than you reckon. If you walk slowly in winter, you'll freeze!
Walking is probably one area where my habits are not very Pinoy. I like to walk and walk rapidly if possible: more exercise, more opportunity to think, less pollution.
But it's not just walking that Pinoys do slowly compared to most industrialized societies. Eating is another thing, though our habits are changing. I will never get used to gulping things down while standing or walking. Eating a sandwich at your desk is one of the most awful ways to spend lunchtime. Slow food=good food, sociable and slim people. Fast food=crap food, obesity, sad people eating TV dinners alone.
Posted by: Carla | February 01, 2007 at 04:05 PM
Gigi is right about the faster speed of escalators in Hong Kong. They're maybe nearly twice as quick as those here. And for those who still think they're too slow, users are urged to stand on the right to leave the left free for the sprinters.
Not everybody complies, though. Sometimes you see a couple of women, side by side, nattering, while an irritated crowd builds up behind them.
Torn is apparently offering a prize of a weekend in his condo, free of charge, for the first person to guess who these people usually are.
Posted by: Cogs | February 01, 2007 at 09:56 PM
I also feel that it's lack of economic activity that makes Filipinos stroll along, not getting hurried, when work is not that much or there are just no important meetings or engagements to meet. Unlike New Yorkers or those in Tokyo where there just seems to be always buzzing on the PDA's about this and that important meet.
Posted by: Major Tom | February 04, 2007 at 01:50 AM
I did some "practical research" this weekend. It is not hot at the time being, so it is nicer to walk. But I did not notice any increase in the general pace...
mlq is definitely right also with his argument: that people want to arrive pretty.
Posted by: Gü | February 04, 2007 at 11:46 PM
I work in Ortigas and people here don't walk slow. I just arrived from Baguio and I noticed people walk fast there as well. I guess it's about lifestyle too?
Posted by: littlemissliving | February 21, 2007 at 09:39 PM
Here's an interesting article related to your post:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6614643.stm
People are walking 10% more quickly than a decade ago, according to research in 32 cities across the globe.
Singapore showed a 30% increase, making it the most frenetic city
Posted by: Javi | May 19, 2007 at 09:04 AM