This subject has been covered many times, but I still find the easy categorization of Barack Obama as “black” quite weird. Barack’s mum is as white as mine. By calling him “black” it seems that Americans (i) can’t get out of their racial filing cabinet, they have to label the guy somehow and, well he looks sort of black and has a black wife so let’s stick him under “b”; and/or (ii) they regard African-American genes as such a pollutant that anyone with a dash of them must be “black”.
This came up with Tiger Woods too, who protested against being filed under “b”, pointing out (to some African-Americans’ displeasure) that he was part Thai, Chinese, native American, and Dutch.
I reckon if Barack were a citizen of a European country he would be described as what he is, mixed race, most of the time. Take Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, the latest tennis sensation, who reached the final of the Australian Open last month. Even before his parents arrived for the final, commentators were at pains to point out that the unseeded Tsongas was the son of an immigrant from Congo and a white French mother. So if tennis commentators can get it right, why not political pundits?
My guess is that, even in America, the sort of racial categorization that asserts Barack’s blackness is going to seem very old fashioned in a few short years. You just have to go to Europe these days and look around you; at least in the large cities, the number of mixed race kids is growing apace. Even in my quite traditional Scottish family, my cousin married an Indian guy and they have two kids. As Woody Guthrie said:
And all creeds and kinds and colors Of us are blending Till I suppose ten million years from now We'll all be just alikeSame color, same size, working together
And maybe we'll have all of the fascists
Out of the way by then
Maybe so
When you think of all the harm that racial categorization has done in human history I think we will be well shot of it. What does it matter after all?
You are correct about why Obama is called "black", but such categorization is more the aftereffects of historical racial policies rather than just laziness on the part of people. Jim Crow laws of course categorized anyone with "one drop of Negro blood" as automatically Negro, if only to better patrol the boundaries of whiteness and keep it pure. But that also works in reverse, as one is claimed by the Black community as well if one has that one drop. Frederick Douglass and Bob Marley had one white parent, after all, but they were, "of course," Black. (How Obama is seen as "not being black enough" is a different story altogether.)
The fact that it was only in the 2000 Census that Americans were allowed to choose more than one racial category for the first time speaks volumes about North American discomfort with mixed-race / multi-ethnic people -- in short (like bisexuals, actually), with people who don't fit easily within categories, or inhabit the space between them.
Posted by: the wily filipino | February 21, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Excellent response! I first read about Jim Crow when I spent a year at an American high school in my teens. I had spent my early childhood in British colonies in Africa, so I was well used to societies divided along racial lines, but even so Jim Crow legislation struck me as really odd. I think Americans are still feeling its effects today, as you say.
On Bob, that's true, but I suppose it was difficult to see him as mixed race when he identified so totally with his Jamaican half in his appearance, accent, music, ganga, etc.
That's amazing about the census -- it speaks volumes as you say!
Posted by: torn | February 21, 2008 at 04:47 PM
With technological advances that result in getting a person's genetic genealogy becomes cheaper, such racial classifications can have a more scientific basis.
Posted by: cvj | February 21, 2008 at 08:25 PM
Inasmuch as I think Obama's color is a factor, he represents change on so many levels that in the end, if he does win, his being black/mixed/bi-racial will be incidental and not crucial to his victory
Posted by: bambinawrites | February 24, 2008 at 07:08 AM
"I am Charles Mingus. Half-black man. Yellow man. Half-yellow. Not even yellow, nor white enough to pass for nothing but black and not too light enough to be called white."
FABLES OF FAUBUS by Charles Mingus (1959)
Oh, Lord, don't let 'em shoot us!
Oh, Lord, don't let 'em stab us!
Oh, Lord, don't let 'em tar and feather us!
Oh, Lord, no more swastikas!
Oh, Lord, no more Ku Klux Klan!
Name me someone who's ridiculous, Dannie.
Governor Faubus!
Why is he so sick and ridiculous?
He won't permit integrated schools.
Then he's a fool! Boo! Nazi Fascist supremists!
Boo! Ku Klux Klan (with your Jim Crow plan)
Name me a handful that's ridiculous, Dannie Richmond.
Faubus, Rockefeller, Eisenhower
Why are they so sick and ridiculous?
Two, four, six, eight:
They brainwash and teach you hate.
H-E-L-L-O, Hello.
---------
If Barack is elected he'll be "the Black President." If Hillary is elected she'll be "the Woman President." If McCain is elected he'll be "the President." The schools are now (legally) 'integrated.' The minds are not.
Posted by: Sili | February 25, 2008 at 01:25 AM
This post reminds me of this story about the British athlete Kriss Akabusi, which I'll quote from this other blog (http://www.chuckiedaniel.com/archives/172):
A reporter from one of the major US television networks (I forget which one) was interviewing black British athlete Kriss Akabusi after being a member of the 400 meters relay team that took the gold medal at the 1991 Athletics World Championships. The interviewer started off with:
“So, Kriss, what does this mean to you as an African-American?”
“I’m not American, I’m British”
“Yes, but as a British African-American …”
“I’m not African. I’m not American. I’m British.”
This went on for some time before the reporter got so flustered that she gave up and went to interview someone else. I guess more than anything else it demonstrates the potential absurdity of political correctness — this reporter was so tied-up with the idea that the “correct” term for someone of afro-caribbean ancestry was African-American and not Black that she couldn’t cope with the fact that many black people are neither African nor American.
Posted by: micketymoc | February 27, 2008 at 09:57 PM
Nice one. I remember that relay team well: three were black and one was white, but the funny thing was that the white guy was called Roger Black! According to your reporter I guess he was the only black on the team.
Posted by: torn | February 29, 2008 at 03:53 PM